Last updated: May 16, 2026
In this article
Quick Take
This Taste of the Wild review covers the mid-premium grain-free brand produced by Diamond Pet Foods. Taste of the Wild built its market position on novel-protein, grain-free formulas (bison, salmon, wild boar) at price points meaningfully below ultra-premium boutique brands like Orijen — making it one of the most popular “step-up from grocery store” choices on the US market. It is a reasonable option for healthy adult dogs and cats, with documented limitations worth understanding.
If you are choosing between Taste of the Wild and other premium grain-free options, our Blue Buffalo vs Taste of the Wild comparison is a useful starting point. For dogs or cats with diagnosed disease, Taste of the Wild is wellness food, not therapeutic — see your veterinarian.
Brand Background
Taste of the Wild is owned by Schell & Kampeter Inc., the privately held company that also owns Diamond Pet Foods, Diamond Naturals, Nutra Nuggets, and Premium Edge. Diamond is one of the largest US pet-food manufacturers and operates production facilities in South Carolina, Missouri, California, Arkansas, and (under contract) other regional plants. Taste of the Wild launched in 2007, riding the early wave of consumer demand for grain-free novel-protein formulas.
The brand markets itself around an “ancestral diet” theme — formulas inspired by what wolves and wild cats might have eaten before domestication. The packaging features rugged outdoor imagery, and protein sources include bison, venison, salmon, smoked salmon, wild boar, lamb, and trout. Diamond manufactures all Taste of the Wild products in-house at company-owned plants, which gives the brand more direct quality control than co-packed competitors.
Product Lines Overview
Taste of the Wild’s dog dry kibble lineup includes High Prairie (bison and venison), Pacific Stream (smoked salmon), Sierra Mountain (lamb), Wetlands (fowl-based), Southwest Canyon (wild boar), Appalachian Valley (small breed venison), and Pine Forest (venison). The brand also produces puppy versions of most flagship formulas. The Ancient Grains sub-line adds grains like quinoa, chia seed, and millet back into the formulation for owners who want grain-inclusive options under the same brand.
For cats, Taste of the Wild produces Rocky Mountain Feline (roasted venison and smoked salmon), Canyon River Feline (trout and salmon), and Lowland Creek (quail and duck). The cat lineup is smaller than the dog lineup but uses similar formulation principles. Wet/canned options exist in limited regional distribution.
The Ancient Grains sub-line is worth knowing about because it offers a grain-inclusive option within the brand — useful for owners who want the Taste of the Wild flavor profile without the legume-heavy, grain-free pattern under FDA DCM review. See our grain-free dog food guide.
Ingredient Philosophy
Taste of the Wild flagship formulas list one or two primary novel proteins as the first ingredients (bison, venison, salmon, etc.) followed by a meat meal (chicken meal or ocean fish meal commonly), then peas, sweet potatoes, potatoes, lentils, and a vitamin-mineral premix. The Ancient Grains sub-line replaces some of the legume content with grains. Most formulas include probiotics added after cooking (the brand’s “K9 Strain Probiotics” or “Viables” branding).
The grain-free flagship formulas use multiple legumes (peas, lentils, chickpeas) as primary carbohydrate sources — the same general ingredient pattern flagged in the FDA’s ongoing investigation into a possible link between grain-free legume-heavy diets and dilated cardiomyopathy in dogs. The investigation has not established causation and remains under review. Taste of the Wild responded by launching the Ancient Grains line, giving owners a within-brand alternative.
For cats, true food allergies are most often protein-source allergies (chicken, beef, fish, dairy) rather than grain allergies — see cat food allergies. For dogs, similar principles apply — see dog food allergies.
AAFCO Standards
Most Taste of the Wild adult formulas carry an AAFCO complete-and-balanced statement substantiated by formulation rather than feeding trial. Puppy and growth formulas similarly use formulation substantiation. Feeding-trial substantiation — testing the food in live animals over a defined period — is generally considered stronger evidence and is more common in brands like Hill’s Science Diet, Royal Canin, Purina Pro Plan, and Iams.
This is a fair criticism of the mid-premium grain-free segment broadly rather than Taste of the Wild specifically. Always verify the AAFCO statement on the actual bag — formulations and substantiation methods can change between production runs. The “complete and balanced” claim is the regulatory bar regardless of substantiation method, but feeding trials add an additional layer of in-vivo verification.
Recall History
The most consequential event in Taste of the Wild’s history was the 2012 Diamond Pet Foods Salmonella outbreak. Diamond’s Gaston, South Carolina facility was the source of cross-contamination that affected multiple brands manufactured at that plant — Diamond Naturals, Taste of the Wild, Premium Edge, Solid Gold, Wellness, Natural Balance, Kirkland Signature, and others. The recall expanded over several months in spring 2012, and the FDA documented human salmonellosis cases linked to handling the affected product. Diamond updated facility protocols and the plant resumed production after remediation.
This event is worth knowing because it underscores that recall risk in the pet-food industry is often a manufacturing-facility issue affecting many brands rather than a single-brand quality problem. Beyond 2012, Taste of the Wild has had a relatively limited voluntary-recall history. As always, sign up for FDA pet-food recall alerts and check the FDA recall database directly rather than relying on third-party summaries.
Pros
Strengths owners commonly cite for Taste of the Wild:
- Novel-protein options (bison, venison, wild boar) useful for variety or limited-protein rotation
- Mid-premium pricing — meaningfully less expensive than ultra-premium brands like Orijen or Acana
- Multiple flavor profiles for picky dogs or cats
- Both grain-free flagship and Ancient Grains grain-inclusive sub-lines under one brand
- Manufactured in Diamond-owned facilities with in-house quality control
- Probiotic addition is a useful inclusion (though the live-culture viability through shelf life is debated)
- Available widely at independent pet stores, farm stores, and online
- Outdoor-and-ancestral marketing language resonates with owners of working or sporting dogs
- Smaller ingredient deck on most flagship formulas compared with some competing premium brands
For owners running multi-pet households on Taste of the Wild across both dogs and cats, the cost predictability is one of the brand’s underrated advantages — pricing has been relatively stable compared with some boutique competitors, and the formulas have not shifted dramatically in their public ingredient decks over the past several years.
Cons
Honest weaknesses to weigh:
- 2012 Salmonella recall is a documented part of brand history (and Diamond manufacturing record)
- Formulation-based AAFCO statements rather than feeding-trial substantiation on most lines
- Grain-free flagship formulas match the ingredient pattern under FDA DCM review
- “Bison” or “venison” is often only the first ingredient by weight, with chicken meal or ocean fish meal contributing significant total protein — the novel-protein positioning can be more marketing than formulation
- Not a prescription brand — therapeutic diets for diagnosed disease require veterinary direction
- Cat lineup is narrower than the dog lineup — limited size, age, and condition variants
Pricing Tier
Taste of the Wild sits in the mid-premium tier. On a per-pound basis, expect pricing above grocery-store brands like Pedigree, Friskies, or Iams ProActive Health, and below ultra-premium brands like Orijen or Acana. It is roughly comparable to Blue Buffalo Wilderness, Wellness Complete Health, or Merrick Classic on price. The Ancient Grains sub-line is typically priced similarly to the flagship grain-free formulas within the brand.
For multi-pet households, our multi-pet cost stacking guide covers practical food-budget framing, and the first-year cost of owning a dog piece walks through realistic ranges for dogs.
Who This Is Right For
Taste of the Wild is a sensible choice for healthy adult dogs and cats whose owners want a step up from grocery-store food without paying ultra-premium prices, and who are attracted to novel-protein options or “ancestral diet” branding. The Ancient Grains sub-line is a good option for owners who want the brand’s flavor profiles in a grain-inclusive formulation. Active and outdoor-oriented dogs sometimes do well on the higher protein and fat density of formulas like High Prairie or Wetlands.
Taste of the Wild is a less appropriate choice for dogs with diagnosed cardiac concerns (the FDA DCM investigation makes feeding-trial-tested grain-inclusive diets the more cautious choice), pets with diagnosed disease who need therapeutic nutrition (kidney, GI, urinary, hypoallergenic), and households deeply concerned about Diamond’s manufacturing recall record. It is also probably not the right pick for owners who want feeding-trial AAFCO substantiation.
Compare against feeding-trial-substantiated mainstream brands using our Royal Canin dog food review, Hill’s Science Diet dog food review, and Purina Pro Plan dog food review. For other premium grain-free options, see our Orijen review and Acana review.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Taste of the Wild safe after the 2012 recall?
The 2012 Salmonella event was traced to a specific Diamond facility, which underwent remediation and resumed operations after FDA-supervised improvements. Diamond manufactures multiple brands at that and other facilities. Brands are not “safe” or “unsafe” forever based on a single recall — what matters is current quality protocols. Sign up for FDA recall alerts for ongoing monitoring.
Does Taste of the Wild cause DCM?
The FDA investigation into a possible association between grain-free legume-heavy diets and dilated cardiomyopathy is ongoing without established causation. Taste of the Wild’s grain-free flagship formulas match the general ingredient pattern flagged. The Ancient Grains sub-line does not. Discuss with your veterinarian for individual dog risk assessment, especially for DCM-predisposed breeds.
Is Taste of the Wild good for puppies?
Taste of the Wild has puppy versions of several flagship formulas. For large-breed puppies, confirm the bag’s AAFCO statement reads “growth, including growth of large-size dogs (70 lb or more as adult).” See our best puppy food guide.
How does Taste of the Wild compare to Blue Buffalo?
Both are mid-premium grain-free brands with broad market presence. Taste of the Wild emphasizes novel proteins and ancestral-diet branding; Blue Buffalo emphasizes “real meat first” and life-stage variety. See our Blue Buffalo vs Taste of the Wild comparison for details.
Is the cat formula different from the dog formula?
Yes — cats have different nutrient requirements than dogs (notably taurine, arachidonic acid, and higher protein needs). Never feed dog food to cats long-term. Taste of the Wild’s cat-specific formulas (Rocky Mountain Feline, Canyon River Feline) are formulated for feline requirements and carry cat-specific AAFCO statements.
